Anarchy Works by Peter Gelderloos

This book looks like a collection of examples of functional “anarchy,” though in the intro the author specifies that not all of these non-hierarchical anti-authoritarian groups would have labeled themselves as such, since “anarchy” is a European tradition with a specific lineage.

I got here after playing Assassin’s Creed 3, in which you play a Mohawk character, and reading about the Mohawk people and the Iroquois Confederacy’s consensus-based governing structures, as well as techniques for choosing chiefs: chiefs were chosen by women elders, and their decisions could be vetoed by women elders or they could even be removed by women elders.

A link in the Iroquois Wikipedia page led to this book.

4 Likes

Here is a brief section on the Iroquois from this book:

The Haudennosaunne, called the Iroquois by Europeans, are a matrilineal egalitarian society of eastern North America. They traditionally use several means to balance gender relations. Whereas European civilization utilizes gender division to socialize people into rigid roles and to oppress women, queer, and transgendered people, the gendered division of labor and social roles among the Haudennosaunne functions to preserve a balance, assigning each group autonomous niches and powers, and allowing a greater degree of movement between genders than is considered possible in Western society. For hundreds of years the Haudennosaunne have coordinated between multiple nations using a federative structure, and at each level of organization there were women’s councils and men’s councils. At what might be called the national level, which concerned itself with matters of war and peace, the men’s council made the decisions, though the women held a veto power. At the local level, women held more influence. The basic socio-economic unit, the longhouse, was considered to belong to the women, and men had no council at this level. When a man married a woman, he moved into her house. Any man who did not behave could ultimately be kicked out of the longhouse by the women.

Western society typically sees the “higher” levels of organization as being more important and powerful — even the language we use reflects this; but because the Haudennosaunne were egalitarian and decentralized, the lower or local levels of organization where the women had more influence were more important to daily life. In fact when there was no feud between the different nations the highest council might go a long time without meeting at all. However, their’s was not a “matriarchal” society: men were not exploited or devalued the way women are in patriarchal societies. Rather, each group had a measure of autonomy and means for preserving a balance. Despite centuries of colonization by a patriarchal culture, many groups of Haudennosaunne retain their traditional gender relations and still stand out in sharp contrast to the gender-oppressive culture of Canada and the United States.

2 Likes