Here’s a question: what’s the best, or maybe the most useful, taxonomy for crime tracking?
A Daily Californian reporter is working on this: http://berkeley-crime.s3-website-us-west-1.amazonaws.com
The data set comes from the Berkeley Open Data Portal, which looks inspired by NYC’s.
Further, the data actually comes from here where we should note that
The CrimeView Community data reflect crimes as they have been reported
to members of BPD based on preliminary information supplied to us by
the reporting parties. Preliminary crime classifications may change
based on the direction of follow-up investigations.
All of that is by way of introduction. The Daily Cal author’s question is: how to categorize crime? I and somebody else discussed using UCR and NIBRS categories, which are each different. Briefly:
UCR divides crime between violent crime and property crime. They have a crime hierarchy that labels each incident with the highest associated crime. So if someone steals your bag and beats you up (larceny-theft with assault), it counts as assault, a violent crime, and not larceny-theft, a property crime. There’s a separately tracked category for arson for some reason.
Ultimately this project is restricted by the City of Berkeley’s crime reports categories, which aren’t particularly clear. Do they use a hierarchy? Does each incident only get categorized with the “highest” level of offense, a la UCR?
So the question from the author is: what is a useful classificatory system for this data? Violent crimes, property crimes and minor crimes, as it is now?
I am suggesting the possibility of adding options to view by each type of report (i.e., all arsons, all sexual assaults, etc).
Any other thoughts?